#2002 malibu wakesetter xti cracked#
#2002 malibu wakesetter xti full#

Anyone who is anyone in WAKEBOARDING does not use the WEDGE because it distorts the wake and makes it steeper. I have seen the WEDGE in use behind a WAKESETTER. A tearing shearing stress not even direct pressure.(A STERN THAT IS CHOPPER GUN AND SOME LAID GLASS) Your fuel effiency greatly dimishes. The faster you go the MORE pressure is placed on a 1 by 1 foot area in the stern of the boat.

#2002 malibu wakesetter xti cracked#

No.the idea of the wedge great in thought is NOT all it is cracked up to be. I have owned and skied all of them including a Malibu, some may be better at some things but when it came to the total package MasterCraft did the job the best and the NADA value guide proves it year after year. Better questions to ask may be does resale matter more than top speed? Or what will this boat run and drive like with 1000 hours on it? Those are the questions I asked and you can plainly see where I stand. Is one right and one wrong? That depends on your own personal definitions as either is capable of world record performance. Their wake may be narrower however, when was the last time you were fighting to get to 4 ball and had time to even think about the wake? All this represents two different means to an endвЂ¦a competition slalom boat.

#2002 malibu wakesetter xti full#

Yes, our boat is much heavier than theirsвЂ¦why? Full length floor liner, floatation foam, through bolts, backing plates, nuts, etc and so on. To be completely honest top speed is being held back more now by the 'hook' in the transom.yep 2001s are faster. don't settle for second best!!!Д®ast, the amount of wetted surface is a function of the overall boat design. Look at the loose wiring unloomed, hollow stringers that hold water, non foam filled cavaities, no backing plates on the tower. Look in places you are not susposed to look. It has a great slalom wake along with great wakeboarding wakes.Дo not be fooled. What kind of MORON decided that is a good idea. the downward pressure on the stern from the wedge. Of stress on the stern, when you have a design on the hull that lifts it in the DIAMOND SV23 hull. Not only does the WEDGE create a TREMENDOUS amount there are some reasons as to why a MC is a little slower. It is ALOT of fun to have great hole shot. Compare that as to how the 197 is designed to adhere to the water vs. Lighter, less wetted surface area, different hull design. That more than makes up the front end cost on the boat.ДЄ Malibu Response is a FASTER boat than a PS197. A Mastercraft will hold 20-30% more of its value at that point than a MALIBU. Your loss comes when you trade in or RESELL. with the same profit margins applied, and the SAME options including trailer options. You need to COMPARE apples to apples not apples to oranges !!! On the other hand if your day involves early morning or late PM cuts on glass, with a day of running around on the lake (surfing, wakeboarding and floating- partying) you better not call to many friends or know them all really well. If youвЂ™re main purpose is footing and skiing the course, and the number of people in the boat is not a factor, the 197 or Response LXI may be better suited for your needs. I picked mine up used and the dealer had the hook added for the original owner. I ski the course and wakeboard and found the overall size of the 209 to be more family friendly than the LXI. The major downside to the response was its ride in rough water and tight quarters. I seriously considered the Response last year when I was looking because of its good ski wake and the opportunity to drop the wedge and quickly increase the wake size for boarding. While I am biased, the 209 is still AWSA 3 event approved, much like the 197 and the Response LXI. You have some great points in your questions.